Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount! Hurry Enrol Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc Telegram Channels🔗 👉🏻 Arjita Ma’am- t.me/arjitachaturvedi 👉🏻 StudyIQ Official Channel- t.me/studyiqjudiciary Instagram Handle🔗 instagram.com/studyiq.judiciary?igsh=MWhpcGt0eHo2MWtxbw== For Free Counselling & Preparation Guidance 📞076-4000-3000 Whatsapp Chat 🔗 wa.me/919649876464 🔴 Download Free StudyIQ App to Access Free Courses studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/2ojDHMzCy4 🔴 Free Family Laws Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/gZWzrXpDLB 🔴 Free AIBE Knockout Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/6cQzs62lOO 🎉 Exciting News for All Future Judges! We have launched a New Foundation Batch 🎉 🏆 PRATIGYA JUDICIARY FOUNDATION BATCH 🏆 आपका सपना हमारी ज़िम्मेदारी 📌Batch Link - studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc ⌛Batch Starting From 21st Oct' 24 🎊Key Features - 👉🏻What makes this Batch different is our Performance Evaluation System i.e. 15-day tests and Monthly Mock Tests by which Learners can track their Preparation . 👉🏻 Special Rewards i.e. Monthly Rewards worth 5K 🎉 Use Code " ARJ " to Get maximum discount
धर्मनिरपेक्षता का अर्थ किसी के धर्म का विरोध करना नहीं है और ना ही किसी एक धर्म पर जोर देना है बल्कि सभी को अपने धार्मिक विश्वासों एवं मान्यताओं को पूरी आज़ादी से मानने की छूट देता है। धर्मनिरपेक्ष राज्य में उस व्यक्ति का भी सम्मान होता है जो किसी भी धर्म को नहीं मानता है। धर्म की स्वतंत्रता allready हमारा मौलिक अधिकार है Article 25-28
Obviously जब सेकुलर शब्द असंवैधानिक तरीके से जोड़ा गया था तो क्यों हम लोग और पढ़े लिखे वकील जज उस झूठ को ढोते जा रहे है , इतने वर्षों में किसी ने आज तक उस पर ध्यान नहीं दिया। धन्यवाद अश्विनी उपाध्याय जी और विष्णु शंकर जी का जिन्होंने इतनी गहराई से उसे सबके सामने रखा है।
Yes ! Both the words were inserted during emergency by Presidential order not by the Parliament! It should be omitted by the same authority which had ordered to insert both the words!
@@Adityarothe524 no, aisa kahipe likha nahi hai.. aur preamble koi article nahi.. it is just an introduction.. constitution ki nature ko preamble ke through short me brief kiya jata hai.. to preamble ko hatana is meaningless.. but haan waha multiculturalism bhi use kar sakte hai, it is just a struggle of power, bjp doing this to take an edge over congress
Bina discussion k 2014 k baad bhi bahut kuch ho gaya hamne to dekha hai aapne nhi dekho hoga wo alag baat hai.... discussion 10 saal se ho hee nhi raha tha, iss bar LoP aa gaya isliye thoda bahut ho raha hai...ab bol do hamko congressi, jo questions uthae wo congressi 😂😂😂😂
Why should the Supreme Court come into the picture ?? Was the Court consulted when these words were incorporated ?? Was it discussed and passed in Parliament ?? If not, it must be removed without any further discussion !!
after it was incorporated we got big landmark judgements on it lol. what r u even saying, SC is consulted when parliament makes the law or after? pls read polity of 6th first!!!!
@genylegend😂 constitution assembly ne kyuu nahi dala secular kya wo bhi baki religions ko khatm karna chahate the Aur konse baki religion constitution me budh jain sikh vedic sabh ko hindu bola hi jew aur parsi ko hindu logo ke hi shelter diye the aur saal ke 1.5M+ log muslim ya Christian bn rahe hai india me konss religion kon khatm kiya ja rah hI
अगर कोर्ट ऐसा नहीं करेगा तब government parliament से ही इसको hatayegi क्युकी तब government को कहने के लिए होगा की ये कोर्ट का नहीं parliament का matter है इसलिए government के दोनों हाथो में Laddu है अब
@King55970 2/3 majority chahiye dono houses mai loksabha mai 365 MP ka support lagbhag....ispe court bhi bahut aage tak nhi jaegi...jyada hua to bench banakar 8-10 saal k liye latka degi..
कांग्रेस पार्टी छुप कर ही ऐसे कानूनी घपले करती है जैसे 2002 से 2014 तक किये गए changes शैक्षणिक सिलेबस बदलना, वक्फ एक्ट को अंधाधुंध शक्तियां देना जिसके दुष्परिणाम बुरे तरीके से सामने आ रहे हैं।
After deleting the word of secular socialist word from the constitution the Bharat desh must be required to be declared as a Hindu rashtra to Bharat desh
🙏👍 I agree with the petitioners points of view on the amendment made during emergency. Moreover, SC should hear the case on day to day basis urgently to set the things in right direction at the earliest. Hari Om
Kyu isliye ki jiski government Bane country ko usi name se jana jana chahiye ....aaj koi hindu government Bane to India ( Bharat) ko hindustan se jana jana kya...ya... Muslim government Bane to India ko muslim ke name se pahchan ho ...I am totally against about removing to this two words
@@Anjali-naturelover-8762.Tumne suna nahi constitution k andar equal rights likhe gaye hai ,,,aur maan lo agar muslim gov ban gayi toh wo Kitna secularism follow karenge?
Secularism term have no use in India secularism creates mechanism for left,liberal,Muslims petitioners to use that particular word against India and hindus....,!!
@@pritish1546 ya constitution ke andar sare rights diye gye hai but jo power preamble hai hai vo constitution me nhi hai .....aur dusri baat log baar baar kyu constitution ko change karna chahte hai atleast... preamble ke basic structure ko to change nhi Krna chahiye.....hame ye samajh nhi aa rha ki 1949 me constitution ko adopt Kiya gya usme amendment kar sovereign and socialist ko add Kiya gya to Aya problem hai ...I think in two words ko aad se itna fark nhi padta ki ho usko remove Kiya jaye .......These two words are very important.
Abey yeh lawri kabhi dekha hai Islami ko secular bante huye??? Inke Qur'an mein yeisb nahi hai aur isliye secular sirf ham palan kare yei konsa logic hai?@@Anjali-naturelover-8762.
Constitution को original format मे ही रखना चाहिए ❤❤ अगर constitution मे सोशलिस्ट, सेक्युलर शब्द बिना सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अनुमती से डाले तो निकलने के लिये सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे क्यो जाना चाहिए? पार्लमेंट मे ही दोनो शब्द निकाल देना चाहिए!!
Socialist secularism words deliberately entered in to constitution without taking consent of opposition party. This happed in imergency which imposed by Indira
The words "socialist" and "secular" were added to the Indian Constitution's Preamble during the Indian Emergency in 1976, through the 42nd Amendment ¹ ². This amendment was passed by the Parliament during Indira Gandhi's government, aiming to incorporate these values into the Constitution. The addition of "socialist" reflects India's commitment to social democracy, emphasizing the importance of distributive justice and reducing socio-economic inequalities ¹. On the other hand, "secular" ensures that the state maintains a neutral stance towards all religions, guaranteeing equal freedom and respect for all citizens ¹ ². Interestingly, although these words were formally introduced in 1976, the Constitution already had socialist and secular content through various Directive Principles of State Policy and fundamental rights ¹ ². The Supreme Court even recognized secularism as a basic structure of the Constitution in 1974, two years before the amendment ².
When the founding fathers of Indian constitution has denied socialist and secular word in constitution , who the HELL is Supreme court or any body to introduce socialist and secular word in constitution.?
Actually bro... funadamental structure of our constitution interpretates that India is 'Religiously Impartial'. Now the word religiously impartial is not equal to word secular rather it means that the state is not aligned to any specific religion. This enables our government and lawmakers to assess any community in respect to their specific circumstances without creating any bias. The concept of secularism does not includes this ability. But Indira Gandhi hurrily added this word without understanding the difference. And this word is now being misused against the majority population.
syria ko yaad kar lio jara syria aur pak religion desh hain unka kya haal ho raha h ye nahi dikh raha ? sirf hindu rashtra naam kehne se india top pe ho jayega kya ? kattar dharm k desh ka bura haal ho ta hai syria सीरिया ka haal dekh nahi ?
@@neel333neelare Brahmic and abrahmic religions same ?? World most developed countries have cross in their flag, and they have state religion as Christianity, then why India shouldn’t be allowed to become Hindu rastra? Its not about country becoming religious its about countries losing rationality, the countries you mentioned have lost rationality but people see it as religious.
सरकार किसी की हो सिस्टम हमारा है को सिद्ध करेगा सुप्रीम कोर्ट आज सुप्रीम कोर्ट पर अधिक विश्वास नहीं कर सकते हैं कई फैसले ने चौंकाया हैं सुप्रीम कोर्ट किसके लिए कार्य कर रहा है देश के लिए या एनजीओ के लिए
"Great content as always! Could you please create a video discussing the secular principles in our Constitution and how they align or conflict with certain laws that are community-specific? Specifically, a deep dive into acts like the Waqf Act, personal civil codes, and their implications would be really insightful. It would be great to hear your views and spark a meaningful discussion around this topic. Thanks!"
It was always a Hindu Land it should be hindu nation ,protect native religions as well. Tribals from northeast should also leave foreign religion follow their Ancient culture . Tribals were nature worshiper .
कोई भी धर्म अपने फायदे के लिए संविधान की प्रस्तावना से छेड़छाड़ नहीं करना चाहिए जैसे धर्मनिरपेक्ष और समाजवाद आदि शब्द । ये दोनों ही शब्द बेहद महत्वपूर्ण और अति आवश्यक हैं , जिन्हें कई मनीषी, चिंतक , बुद्धिजीवियों ने मंथन के बाद सर्वसहमति से देश के उत्थान के लिए लिया गया है । सुप्रीम कोर्ट इनकी महत्ता को समझें , चिंतन करें और निष्पक्ष भाव से फैसला करें । क्योंकि सरकार और गैरबराबरी वाद संगठन मिलकर अपने धर्म विशेष के फायदे और धार्मिक व्यवस्था को कायम रखने के लिए हटाने पर जोर दे रहे हैं , जो देश के हित में नहीं है । इस तरह तो कोई अन्य धार्मिक लोगों की सरकार आने पर वे भी अपने अनुसार संविधान से छेड़छाड़ कर सकते हैं , जो पूर्णतः ग़लत है । भारत में सभी धर्मों के लोग रहते हैं , सब के सम्मान और सद्भावना हेतु अत्यन्त महत्वपूर्ण है । सुप्रीम कोर्ट को फैसला निष्पक्ष देना चाहिए , ताकि देश की शांति बनी रहे ।
अबे चरसी सेक्यूलर और अल्पसंख्यक दोनों शब्द नहीं हो सकते। अगर सेक्यूलर है तो अल्पसंख्यक चरण चुंबन क्यों। सब धर्मों के लिए बराबर अवसर न कि मुसलमानों के लिए अलग से अवसर।
@@anindian6557 Do u reality think, this type of dumb people ever read or know anything about ambedkar ji... They just know some propaganda nothing concrete...
Aapne emergency dekhi hai kya . Emergency ke dauran kya kya hua tha ek baar google karke padh lena . Pata chal jaayega ki abhi ka samay kharaab hai ki emergency ka
Are u trying to challenge the thoughts of our respected BR Ambedkar ji ? Our respected Ambedkar ji did not include these words and he had logic of not doing it.
@@ravijeeverma876 No bro, I didn't challenged thoughts of Ambedkar ji. But can you please give me reference where Ambedkar ji said he was against it ??
Kya bkwas hai ye, secular hone kya dikkt hai logo ko. Ye sab desh todna chahte hai dhram k nam pr. Ase toh sare low thope hue h hum par vo bhi khrij hone chaiye. Secular follow krne se desh m ekta or sath rehna chahti h
@@rkey4388 It has my boy, it has. We all know from where these ideas coming from😂. This not Pakistan that Government will be religion specific and the court will approve 😂
@@YugantSamal no it's not SON and second it is in court and court will decide.. Your point is irrelevant here, if Indian govt. Was like Pakistan the way you said.., it was already implementation... And if you have little sense you will understand that even court is not secular when it comes to religion and not equal when it comes to men/women...
Hona bhi chahiye 20%upper caste Hindus ko muslim bana Jana chahiye aur tab hum 40% ho jayenge aur civil war start kar denge kyuki hum desh ke liye soch Rahe hai aur obc hamara hi gala kaatne par tule huye hai roj reservation badhta ja raha hai
The constitution itself provides power to parliament of India to ammend any part of the constitution. The constitution doesn't give power to SC to restrict these powers conferred to Parliament to ammend any part of constitution. Members of parliament are elected by people of the nation while SC judges are not. Restriction of power of parliament of ammending contitution by SC is itself unconstitutional. However, since these words were included during emergency by violating everything, that is why these words should be removed. If these were added to preamble during normal times by proper discussion in parliament then they should be valid.
Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount!
Hurry Enrol Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
Telegram Channels🔗
👉🏻 Arjita Ma’am- t.me/arjitachaturvedi
👉🏻 StudyIQ Official Channel- t.me/studyiqjudiciary
Instagram Handle🔗 instagram.com/studyiq.judiciary?igsh=MWhpcGt0eHo2MWtxbw==
For Free Counselling & Preparation Guidance 📞076-4000-3000
Whatsapp Chat 🔗
wa.me/919649876464
🔴 Download Free StudyIQ App to Access Free Courses
studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/2ojDHMzCy4
🔴 Free Family Laws Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/gZWzrXpDLB
🔴 Free AIBE Knockout Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/6cQzs62lOO
🎉 Exciting News for All Future Judges! We have launched a New Foundation Batch 🎉
🏆 PRATIGYA JUDICIARY FOUNDATION BATCH 🏆
आपका सपना हमारी ज़िम्मेदारी
📌Batch Link - studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
⌛Batch Starting From 21st Oct' 24
🎊Key Features -
👉🏻What makes this Batch different is our Performance Evaluation System i.e. 15-day tests and Monthly Mock Tests by which Learners can track their Preparation .
👉🏻 Special Rewards i.e. Monthly Rewards worth 5K
🎉 Use Code " ARJ " to Get maximum discount
Sir Bharat Secular country hai bhi nahi. Ispar ab chamche congressi royenge.
धर्मनिरपेक्षता का अर्थ किसी के धर्म का विरोध करना नहीं है और ना ही किसी एक धर्म पर जोर देना है बल्कि सभी को अपने धार्मिक विश्वासों एवं मान्यताओं को पूरी आज़ादी से मानने की छूट देता है। धर्मनिरपेक्ष राज्य में उस व्यक्ति का भी सम्मान होता है जो किसी भी धर्म को नहीं मानता है।
धर्म की स्वतंत्रता allready हमारा मौलिक अधिकार है Article 25-28
No need kick out that
Supreme comedy of India 😊
Aap jaisi teacher pure desh me ho Jaye toh India ka future bright ho jaega ❤🙏
Obviously जब सेकुलर शब्द असंवैधानिक तरीके से जोड़ा गया था तो क्यों हम लोग और पढ़े लिखे वकील जज उस झूठ को ढोते जा रहे है , इतने वर्षों में किसी ने आज तक उस पर ध्यान नहीं दिया। धन्यवाद अश्विनी उपाध्याय जी और विष्णु शंकर जी का जिन्होंने इतनी गहराई से उसे सबके सामने रखा है।
*ये दोनों शब्द लगातार समस्त हिन्दुस्थानियों को धोखा देते आए ,और अभी भी धोखा दे रहे हैं*
Lots of things has got unnoticed..where was the SC when Khangress brought the WAQF bill cos thats unconstitutional..
Bhai padhai krle
very well put mam, all the points very well explained
Yes ! Both the words were inserted during emergency by Presidential order not by the Parliament!
It should be omitted by the same authority which had ordered to insert both the words!
These 2 illegally added words should be removed asap.
Secular word can be removed but not 25 28, to hatane se kuch nahi badlega, India secular hi rahega
@@Vasudeva777 country is secular, people are not.
@@Vasudeva777ya but those article give equal rights to all but secularism is only imposes on majority 😅
@@Adityarothe524 no, aisa kahipe likha nahi hai.. aur preamble koi article nahi.. it is just an introduction.. constitution ki nature ko preamble ke through short me brief kiya jata hai.. to preamble ko hatana is meaningless.. but haan waha multiculturalism bhi use kar sakte hai, it is just a struggle of power, bjp doing this to take an edge over congress
@@Vasudeva777india kavi secular nehi tha. Kyun ki personal law board wakf board rehte secular nehi ho sakta
🚩 *जयश्रीराम*
🇮🇳 *जयश्रीकृष्ण*
🕉️ *हर हर महादेव*
It is unconstitutional. Without any discussion in parliamentary session how these two words were inserted in our constitution?
Idiot.. rahul khan puppet
Nehru ki beti ne daldiya tha
Bina discussion k 2014 k baad bhi bahut kuch ho gaya hamne to dekha hai aapne nhi dekho hoga wo alag baat hai.... discussion 10 saal se ho hee nhi raha tha, iss bar LoP aa gaya isliye thoda bahut ho raha hai...ab bol do hamko congressi, jo questions uthae wo congressi 😂😂😂😂
Please explain
Jaise Bina discussion ke jod diya tha 😂
These words must be removed
Those words must be removed.
🤬😡😡
@@endless812 i believe, you are jihadi 😁 esliye jli na 😁
Bilkul
@@endless812khatna ho gya kya tera
tell reason why ?
Yes it is TRUE. All should be removed from the constitution.
Why should the Supreme Court come into the picture ?? Was the Court consulted when these words were incorporated ?? Was it discussed and passed in Parliament ?? If not, it must be removed without any further discussion !!
Absolutely I strongly agree
after it was incorporated we got big landmark judgements on it lol. what r u even saying, SC is consulted when parliament makes the law or after? pls read polity of 6th first!!!!
Socialist, secular हटाना चाहिए..
@genylegend Sanatan only suppresses those who are against it. Only those are afraid who fall in this category.
Yes🎉🎉🎉. Jai hind
@genylegend😂 constitution assembly ne kyuu nahi dala secular kya wo bhi baki religions ko khatm karna chahate the Aur konse baki religion constitution me budh jain sikh vedic sabh ko hindu bola hi jew aur parsi ko hindu logo ke hi shelter diye the aur saal ke 1.5M+ log muslim ya Christian bn rahe hai india me konss religion kon khatm kiya ja rah hI
@genylegendHindus never oppress others. It's muslims who opress others. Fuk Islam
@genylegendindia is hindu rastra. That's those are not added in 1950 by baba saheb... Enough of your jihad agenda
जब जोड़े गये थे ये शब्द क्या उस समय पार्लियामेंट में डिसकस और पास हूए थे? यदि नहीं तो अब क्यों? सीधे क्यों नहीं हटाये जा रहे हैं?
2/3 majority chahiye
अगर कोर्ट ऐसा नहीं करेगा तब government parliament से ही इसको hatayegi क्युकी तब government को कहने के लिए होगा की ये कोर्ट का नहीं parliament का matter है इसलिए government के दोनों हाथो में Laddu है अब
@King55970 2/3 majority chahiye dono houses mai loksabha mai 365 MP ka support lagbhag....ispe court bhi bahut aage tak nhi jaegi...jyada hua to bench banakar 8-10 saal k liye latka degi..
ये शब्द जब जोडे गये तभी देशमें इंदिराजी ईमर्जन्सी थोपी थी
कांग्रेस पार्टी छुप कर ही ऐसे कानूनी घपले करती है जैसे 2002 से 2014 तक किये गए changes शैक्षणिक सिलेबस बदलना, वक्फ एक्ट को अंधाधुंध शक्तियां देना जिसके दुष्परिणाम बुरे तरीके से सामने आ रहे हैं।
🙏 वन्दे मातरम् 🙏 हटेंगे तो सबके लिए सर्वोत्तम 🙏 प्रणाम 🙏🇮🇳 सबका हित सबके लिए सोने पे सुहागा 🙏🇮🇳
The much needed move... Absolutely this words must be removed from the preamble...
After deleting the word of secular socialist word from the constitution the Bharat desh must be required to be declared as a Hindu rashtra to Bharat desh
Bilkul sahi💯
Your information regarding removal of these two words is very nice and important
It is a good point must be raised
🙏👍 I agree with the petitioners points of view on the amendment made during emergency. Moreover, SC should hear the case on day to day basis urgently to set the things in right direction at the earliest. Hari Om
It is a genuine demand on the part of every law abiding ,nationalist citizen.Jsi Ho ! Jai Hind !❤❤❤
Ye secular word pure Bharat me khi nhi bola jana chahiye
Kyu isliye ki jiski government Bane country ko usi name se jana jana chahiye ....aaj koi hindu government Bane to India ( Bharat) ko hindustan se jana jana kya...ya... Muslim government Bane to India ko muslim ke name se pahchan ho ...I am totally against about removing to this two words
@@Anjali-naturelover-8762.Tumne suna nahi constitution k andar equal rights likhe gaye hai ,,,aur maan lo agar muslim gov ban gayi toh wo Kitna secularism follow karenge?
Secularism term have no use in India secularism creates mechanism for left,liberal,Muslims petitioners to use that particular word against India and hindus....,!!
@@pritish1546 ya constitution ke andar sare rights diye gye hai but jo power preamble hai hai vo constitution me nhi hai .....aur dusri baat log baar baar kyu constitution ko change karna chahte hai atleast... preamble ke basic structure ko to change nhi Krna chahiye.....hame ye samajh nhi aa rha ki 1949 me constitution ko adopt Kiya gya usme amendment kar sovereign and socialist ko add Kiya gya to Aya problem hai ...I think in two words ko aad se itna fark nhi padta ki ho usko remove Kiya jaye .......These two words are very important.
Abey yeh lawri kabhi dekha hai Islami ko secular bante huye??? Inke Qur'an mein yeisb nahi hai aur isliye secular sirf ham palan kare yei konsa logic hai?@@Anjali-naturelover-8762.
Good information
Constitution को original format मे ही रखना चाहिए ❤❤
अगर constitution मे सोशलिस्ट, सेक्युलर शब्द बिना सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अनुमती से डाले तो निकलने के लिये सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे क्यो जाना चाहिए? पार्लमेंट मे ही दोनो शब्द निकाल देना चाहिए!!
Must be removed without delay😢😢
It was inserted illegally 😮😮
No, it was just an introduction, our constitution is already secular and socialist, both.. even after the removal, nothing changes
@@Vasudeva777I thing will change
Hindu will get freedom
@@lipun1531 preamble doesnt give us freedom are u even rte pass? y u commenting stupid stuff
सेक्युलर शब्द हटाना ही चाहिए
100% agree with you
Yes it was added without any discussion in parliament
Remove immediately. Not required for people of our culture.
Celular & Socialism Samvidhan ka Word Nahi hain, Withdra this word from Constitution.
Ex hindu movement jindabad
realist azad
rational world
Science journey
Amit tiwari nastik
Vimoh
Jago panch
Human with science
@@noobprogrammer4281 Jai Makkeswar Mahadev Vagwan ki 🔱🙏🏾🚩
@@noobprogrammer4281 get a life.
@@रवि-ध6ढ Bhai Secular hota hai. Cellular nahi
Fundamental rights me secular world already hai
Teeno Vyaktiyo ko mera Pranam 🙏 🚩
Socialist secularism words deliberately entered in to constitution without taking consent of opposition party.
This happed in imergency which imposed by Indira
The words "socialist" and "secular" were added to the Indian Constitution's Preamble during the Indian Emergency in 1976, through the 42nd Amendment ¹ ². This amendment was passed by the Parliament during Indira Gandhi's government, aiming to incorporate these values into the Constitution.
The addition of "socialist" reflects India's commitment to social democracy, emphasizing the importance of distributive justice and reducing socio-economic inequalities ¹. On the other hand, "secular" ensures that the state maintains a neutral stance towards all religions, guaranteeing equal freedom and respect for all citizens ¹ ².
Interestingly, although these words were formally introduced in 1976, the Constitution already had socialist and secular content through various Directive Principles of State Policy and fundamental rights ¹ ². The Supreme Court even recognized secularism as a basic structure of the Constitution in 1974, two years before the amendment ².
When the founding fathers of Indian constitution has denied socialist and secular word in constitution , who the HELL is Supreme court or any body to introduce socialist and secular word in constitution.?
Right no one has the permission to modify the constitution whether it's court or leaders.@@Amit_Shah001
@@TheSmartEnglish who told you? entire constitution is ammendable, just can't hurt basic structure
You are right, good explanation sir.📚✍️👍👌💐
@@kanakaiahrudrarapu7655 Rubbish. Dr. Ambedkar was against use of these words in the pre-amble.
Pakistan was separated from India based on religion so India is Hindu rashtra, not secular
Actually bro... funadamental structure of our constitution interpretates that India is 'Religiously Impartial'. Now the word religiously impartial is not equal to word secular rather it means that the state is not aligned to any specific religion. This enables our government and lawmakers to assess any community in respect to their specific circumstances without creating any bias. The concept of secularism does not includes this ability. But Indira Gandhi hurrily added this word without understanding the difference. And this word is now being misused against the majority population.
Tera baap ka ha India 😂😂😂😂
syria ko yaad kar lio jara
syria aur pak religion desh hain
unka kya haal ho raha h
ye nahi dikh raha ?
sirf hindu rashtra naam kehne se india top pe ho jayega kya ?
kattar dharm k desh ka bura haal ho ta hai syria सीरिया ka haal dekh nahi ?
@@neel333neelare Brahmic and abrahmic religions same ?? World most developed countries have cross in their flag, and they have state religion as Christianity, then why India shouldn’t be allowed to become Hindu rastra?
Its not about country becoming religious its about countries losing rationality, the countries you mentioned have lost rationality but people see it as religious.
Fully agree ❤
सरकार किसी की हो सिस्टम हमारा है को सिद्ध करेगा सुप्रीम कोर्ट
आज सुप्रीम कोर्ट पर अधिक विश्वास नहीं कर सकते हैं कई फैसले ने चौंकाया हैं सुप्रीम कोर्ट किसके लिए कार्य कर रहा है देश के लिए या एनजीओ के लिए
Yes, the words secular and socialist should be abolished.
Jai Sri Ram... Har Har Mahadev... Jai Sri Krishna... Ayodhya... Kashi... Mathura... Vande Bharat Mata ki... Jai Modiji and team
Good good decision and those words must be removed.
Brilliant PRESENTATION...🙏WOMAN POWER 🙏
Those words must be removed quickly.
Jitna jaldi ho sake hata dena chahiye.
REMOVE THE WORDS
"Great content as always! Could you please create a video discussing the secular principles in our Constitution and how they align or conflict with certain laws that are community-specific? Specifically, a deep dive into acts like the Waqf Act, personal civil codes, and their implications would be really insightful. It would be great to hear your views and spark a meaningful discussion around this topic. Thanks!"
These unconstitutional words must be replaced from preamble
Absolutely big offence done by Indira Gandhi but Modiji must remove this immediately
MUST remove socialist & secular
MUST MUST MUST
Preamble CANNOT be amended
all the more when it was done emergency
And such surreptitiously manner
Excellent 👌👌
Must be removed immediately
Jai Shree Ram Jai Shree Krishna 🚩🙏🚩🙏 These words must be Removed
Secular but minority?????!!!!🤔🤔🤔 How it's possible??
Wohi to agar secular hata diya jaye to hindu ko bhi freedom mil jayega
अभी अभी इंडिया उतरे हो ??
Bilkul hata dena chahiue
Vote for Hindu rastra 🚩✅
Very good narration with updates on case in SC
BJP jitega jarur is Case me✊🏾
Suprime kotha has entered the chat
Ex hindu movement jindabad
realist azad
rational world
Science journey
Amit tiwari nastik
Vimoh
Jago panch
Human with science
🍌@@noobprogrammer4281
BJP hatao desh bachao
@@noobprogrammer4281ex muslim Adam seeker ex lundbedkarite jindabad
Time has come to think for the voters about the question arises on two vital words of the Constitution.
Yes, remove there words from Constitution
These words must be removed.
संविधान बचाओ चिल्लाने वाले लोगों को यह नहीं दिखाई देता कि उन्होने कितनी बार संविधान की धज्जियां उड़ाई है l❤❤
Reality me ye hotni chahiye or supreme court sacha me niyam kanun or dosabej par adharit hai ta hot jayega.
Very good presentation by Mam
Indira was worst PM
Shame On कॉंग्रेस 😮😮😮
Thanks to Adhwiniji & Subramanyam ji
Petitioners have put very strong points.
It should have been done earlier
42 constitution amendment act 1976 hai
Public opinion must be taken instead of Judiciary....
We the people of this country all above everything....
Remove secular and socialist words from constitution, incert, democratic and Vedic civilization country 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
And sanatana Dharma too
Appreciable
On the way to Hindu Nation.......😂😂😂😂
It was always a Hindu Land it should be hindu nation ,protect native religions as well. Tribals from northeast should also leave foreign religion follow their Ancient culture . Tribals were nature worshiper .
Very good step.
What a move! Awesome ❤
यह दोनों शब्द समस्त हिन्दुस्थानियों को सदैव धोखा देती है
Very good presentation of this valuable information
कोई भी धर्म अपने फायदे के लिए संविधान की प्रस्तावना से छेड़छाड़ नहीं करना चाहिए जैसे धर्मनिरपेक्ष और समाजवाद आदि शब्द । ये दोनों ही शब्द बेहद महत्वपूर्ण और अति आवश्यक हैं , जिन्हें कई मनीषी, चिंतक , बुद्धिजीवियों ने मंथन के बाद सर्वसहमति से देश के उत्थान के लिए लिया गया है । सुप्रीम कोर्ट इनकी महत्ता को समझें , चिंतन करें और निष्पक्ष भाव से फैसला करें । क्योंकि सरकार और गैरबराबरी वाद संगठन मिलकर अपने धर्म विशेष के फायदे और धार्मिक व्यवस्था को कायम रखने के लिए हटाने पर जोर दे रहे हैं , जो देश के हित में नहीं है । इस तरह तो कोई अन्य धार्मिक लोगों की सरकार आने पर वे भी अपने अनुसार संविधान से छेड़छाड़ कर सकते हैं , जो पूर्णतः ग़लत है । भारत में सभी धर्मों के लोग रहते हैं , सब के सम्मान और सद्भावना हेतु अत्यन्त महत्वपूर्ण है । सुप्रीम कोर्ट को फैसला निष्पक्ष देना चाहिए , ताकि देश की शांति बनी रहे ।
Yes, good thought.
Same point I also agree.😊😊
अबे चरसी सेक्यूलर और अल्पसंख्यक दोनों शब्द नहीं हो सकते।
अगर सेक्यूलर है तो अल्पसंख्यक चरण चुंबन क्यों।
सब धर्मों के लिए बराबर अवसर न कि मुसलमानों के लिए अलग से अवसर।
Sanvidhan Mein jarurat ke anusar banaa Hua Hai sanvidhan ko chhedchhad karna Desh Ki barbadi Hai
This is absolutely a right decision. These two words must be deleted from the preamble of our Constitution.
Well explained on your side
जनरल जाति के जज को कभी मुख्य जज न बनाया जाए।
😢 शर्म नही आ रही है बंग्लादेश में आप लोगो के साथ क्या हुआ
Supreme Court must issue notice to Central Govt.
Referred subject has been well explained.
Ambedkar contribution in Constitution is not more than 5%.
Very nice analysis,
religion ke naam par rajniti hone lagega sidhe taur par
Points are so strong and these words must be deleted. Jai Bharat
B.R Ambekar was also against rss then why rss working.
@@gamexinfo332 valid point..., do some research...
U will figure it out..
Ambedkar was against to keep muslim in india after partition on basis of religion
@@anindian6557 Do u reality think, this type of dumb people ever read or know anything about ambedkar ji...
They just know some propaganda nothing concrete...
Br Ambedkar didn't even contribute more than 5% in the constitution. Stop sucking up to that guy
@@TheMcMemer damn.... someone telling hard facts...
Ye Remove hona hi Chahiye.. 🥰🚩
अभी तो Emergency से भी ख़तरनाक समय चल रहा है।
kyo bakf board khatm ho rha hai isliye?
Chal jhoothe😂
Teri nasbandi Kara di kya jo emergency me kiya tha b*******k
Aapne emergency dekhi hai kya . Emergency ke dauran kya kya hua tha ek baar google karke padh lena . Pata chal jaayega ki abhi ka samay kharaab hai ki emergency ka
Tribal ko Kaun convert kar raha hai.
Right, madam ji. It should be removed first for the interest of the country.
These words should not be removed. If these words are removed,it will be against Idea of India.
Are u trying to challenge the thoughts of our respected BR Ambedkar ji ? Our respected Ambedkar ji did not include these words and he had logic of not doing it.
@@ravijeeverma876 No bro, I didn't challenged thoughts of Ambedkar ji. But can you please give me reference where Ambedkar ji said he was against it ??
@@avinnash_kumar read the Constituent assembly debates
These two words are put in constitution by the way that is against the idea of india.
@@avinnash_kumarpreamble cannot amended
Kya bkwas hai ye, secular hone kya dikkt hai logo ko. Ye sab desh todna chahte hai dhram k nam pr. Ase toh sare low thope hue h hum par vo bhi khrij hone chaiye. Secular follow krne se desh m ekta or sath rehna chahti h
सही है, यह गलत शब्द हटाने ही चाहिए - no socialist - No secular words in Constitution wrongly introduced by Congress to get Votes only
Nothing is going to happen. Supreme Court is not RSS court😂
it has nothing to do with RSS....
Yes😂😂😂😂😂
@@rkey4388 It has my boy, it has. We all know from where these ideas coming from😂. This not Pakistan that Government will be religion specific and the court will approve 😂
RSS hi Hai
@@YugantSamal no it's not SON and second it is in court and court will decide..
Your point is irrelevant here, if Indian govt. Was like Pakistan the way you said.., it was already implementation...
And if you have little sense you will understand that even court is not secular when it comes to religion and not equal when it comes to men/women...
Completely correct petition..
This country shouldn't be called Secular...The country was given independence on the basis of Religion...
देश का विनाश नजदीक है
Hona bhi chahiye 20%upper caste Hindus ko muslim bana Jana chahiye aur tab hum 40% ho jayenge aur civil war start kar denge kyuki hum desh ke liye soch Rahe hai aur obc hamara hi gala kaatne par tule huye hai roj reservation badhta ja raha hai
Use pahale tere binash hog!
Very good step 🪜😊
Sab anpad log comment kr re hai remove😂😂😂😂😂
Agar ek pm dal sakta hain, to ek pm remove kar sakta hain, simple
Kaun si degree h tumhare pas
@@srishti4870 BA ,PG in human rights, LLB and PG in international relation
@@Adv.yasirkhan WhatsApp university SE Kiya hai 😂
@@akhileshchaudhary9018 Apni tarha samjha ha kya andhbhagtoo whatsApp se sirf tum or tumhare papa he degree krte hai🤣🤣🤣😊😊
Mam, preamble is based but interpretation is development of mind .This is a matter of how close people interpret the constitution .
Socialist, Secular शब्द अवश्य ही हटाना चाहिए।
Thank you mam very good explanation ❤
Bahut sundar
Appreciate that you have made this video
Put the responsibilities on leaders responsible and keep them behind bars.
The constitution itself provides power to parliament of India to ammend any part of the constitution. The constitution doesn't give power to SC to restrict these powers conferred to Parliament to ammend any part of constitution. Members of parliament are elected by people of the nation while SC judges are not. Restriction of power of parliament of ammending contitution by SC is itself unconstitutional. However, since these words were included during emergency by violating everything, that is why these words should be removed. If these were added to preamble during normal times by proper discussion in parliament then they should be valid.
Good decision ❤
Bilkul हटने चाहिए पूर्ण समर्थन , वैसे भी इन्हें जोड़ा गया था 1971 में इंदिरा गांधी के द्वारा , संविधान में छेड़छाड़ करके ।
Absolutely correct